Bush appointee nominated to the court in 2002. The administration is expected to appeal Thursday’s ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.Ĭollyer is a George W. The White House had earlier argued that the House had no legal authority to pursue its lawsuit, but Collyer rejected that argument and allowed the case to proceed. The disputed subsidies help lower-earning people afford out-of-pocket costs such as annual insurance deductibles and co-payments when they visit doctors. The House had already voted dozens of times to repeal all or parts of the law known as ObamaCare, but most of those efforts went nowhere in the Senate and with President Obama in the White House. (Not all states have expanded their Medicaid programs.) Support innovative medical care. House Republicans authorized the lawsuit in 2014 over Democratic objections. Congress authorized reduced cost sharing but did not appropriate monies for it. The administration has said it is using other, previously approved money.Ĭollyer issued an order stopping further reimbursements, but said it would not take effect pending an appeal. The Obamacare markets: Trump is making Democrats pay for writing an. It says the administration is spending the money anyway, exceeding its constitutional authority. The House argued that Congress never specifically appropriated that money and has denied the administration’s request for it. Obamacare discussions started in February of 2009 when President Obama called a joint session of Congress to create a structure for healthcare legislation. The ruling from US District Judge Rosemary Collyer is a win for House Republicans who brought the politically charged legal challenge in an effort to undermine the law.Īt stake is $175 billion the government is paying over a decade to reimburse health insurers for reducing co-payments for lower-income people. The New York Times catalogued these efforts under the headline: The Same Agency That Runs Obamacare Is Using Taxpayer Money. WASHINGTON - A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Obama administration is unconstitutionally spending federal money to fund the president’s health care law. Obama makes first public appearance at White House since 2017 Obama's utter hypocrisy on 'disinformation'īarack Obama’s humiliation of feeble ol’ Joe Biden Representative Charlie Rangel (D, NY) doesn’t disappoint by shying from this big government, money wasting attitude where it concerns Obamacare, either. So now the Republicans will have to decide their next move, whether it’s just more records requests or new efforts to tie the Obama administration’s hands in future appropriations bills. If the Obama administration officials want to bailout insurers that lose money on the ObamaCare exchanges, they’ll have to go through Congress. Yet another 'Inflation Reduction Act' handout - in health care - would worsen inflation Not enough money is being thrown around to fix things that’s always the liberal’s lament. But HHS didn’t say exactly how it spent the money, and it didn’t lay out the kind of detail Republicans sought.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |